Continue playing Product Showdown

Product Showdown

aka Shoe-Jitsu, Shoe-mo Wrestling, Shoe Duel, and a number of other witty names we couldn't decide on.

Clarks Un.Gregor

Battle Stats

  • Total Wins: 7
  • Total Losses: 7
  • Wins vs. Competitor: 1
  • Sales Rank: #45481
  • Classic meets modern with this handsome Clarks® style.
  • Full-grain leather upper in a fashionable silhouette.
  • Elastic gore at each side allows for an easy, slip-on fit.
  • Padded collar provides additional comfort.
  • Leather and suede lining and footbed buffer the foot.
  • OrthoLite® footbed provides all-day cushion and comfort.
  • Durable rubber outsole.
  • Imported.
  • Measurements:
    • Weight: 12 oz
  • Product measurements were taken using size 11, width D - Medium. Please note that measurements may vary by size.

Average Customer Ratings (based on 2 reviews)

Overall: (4 Stars) Comfort: (4 Stars) Style: (4 Stars)

Posted: 2013-01-07 18:30:26
Reviewer: Anonymous from North East Ohio
Overall: (5 Stars) Comfort: (5 Stars) Style: (4 Stars)
They may run big. I bought 2 pairs (black and brown) of Clarks Un.Tudor (Discontinued? Replaced by the Un.Kenneth?) in January 2010. I wear each pair at least 9 hours a day, once a week (you have to rotate your shoes), 52 weeks a year (less vacation). Quality: Out of 9 pairs of dress shoes I've owned (and worn out) over the years these have held up the best. In fact, it's not even close. The primary reason why is because the rubber outer sole is so versatile, especially in rainy/snowy Ohio. The outer soles are showing just a little wear in the very back heel area. The heel and ball area of the insole are darkening nicely (as described by Clarks) and barely show the slightest sign of wear. Other than that I can't find anything worn or even an unsewn thread or unglued rubber. Fit: I believe I have an 11.5 wide foot. Back in 2010 I tried on roughly 40 different styles of dress shoes ranging in size from 11.5-12.0. (I'm not exaggerating. My wife can verify. I am meticulous.) 3 styles fit well, but 1 of them fit perfect: Un.Tudor in size 11.5 EE. I never did try on a size 11.0 EE. This brings me to the main point of this whole review: Clarks may run .5 to 1.0 of a size too big. Either that or I don t know what size foot I have. (Highly possible.) I just truly realized this when I tried on my first pair of loafers, the Clarks Un.Anders in size 11.5 EE (naturally). I don't know if loafers are supposed to fit differently (if you do please let me know) than non loafers, but every time I take a step my heel comes up about an inch and almost out of the shoe. This usually only happens when shoes are too big. I tried them on with thick athletic socks, but it didn't change. This made me check my Un.Tudors. Turns out, I have quite a bit of room in the toe box. Maybe 1.0 to 2.0 inches. (At least a half shoe size.) I'd order them in size 11.0 EE to feel the difference, but alas they've been discontinued. So I'll never truly know, but maybe I've been wearing too big of shoes all along. Even so they fit great, my feet feel great, and my heel doesn't slip out of the. Comparatively, the Clarks Un.Gregor loafers in size 11.5 EE don't slip at all. This may be because the inside of the heel on the Un.Gregor is made of a grippy type of material all the way to the top of the inside of the heel. The Un.Anders have this same material, but additionally there is a smooth half inch border on the inside of the top of the heel that is naturally not going to grip. Similar to my Un.Tudors I noticed that the Un.Gregor have plenty of room in the toe box. (The Un.Anders do as well.) On top of all this room in the toe box I can stick my pinky finger behind my heel. So guess what? I m going to order the Un.Anders and Un.Gregor in size 11.0 EE. I also have the Un.Sheridan coming in an 11.5 EE so I may be ordering those in 11.0 EE as well. Sorry Zappos for running up your shipping expense, but I must be certain. Hopefully writing these reviews will cut down on the shipping cost for others. It's the least I could do. I probably wouldn't have ever found Clarks if it weren't for Zappos and I m (and my feet) are forever grateful. Thank you. How ironic is it that it s January again and I m buying shoes again? The winter in the north gives you time to do these kinds of things.
Posted: 2012-10-19 13:40:42
Reviewer: Anonymous
Overall: (4 Stars) Comfort: (4 Stars) Style: (4 Stars)
Well made but huge! Buy at least a full size smaller than what you would normally buy. I had to send them back.

Athena Moorea Underwire Tankini FF/G Cup

Battle Stats

  • Total Wins: 4
  • Total Losses: 3
  • Wins vs. Competitor: 0
  • Sales Rank: #20186
  • Less is more in the Athena® Moorea Halter Tankini.
  • Deep v-neckline.
  • Tankini boasts a floral paisley print with contrast design at adjustable halter straps and neckline.
  • Underwire with molded soft cups for comfort and support.
  • Supportive hook closure and keyhole cutout at back.
  • Slim-power® lining.
  • 80% polyester, 20% spandex.
  • Hand wash cold, line dry.
  • Made in the U.S.A.
  • Bottoms not included.
  • Measurements:
    • Length: 20 in
  • Product measurements were taken using size 32FF/G. Please note that measurements may vary by size.
  • If you're not fully satisfied with your purchase, you are welcome to return any unworn and unwashed items with tags intact and original packaging included.

Average Customer Ratings (based on 3 reviews)

Overall: (3 Stars) Comfort: (3 Stars) Style: (4 Stars)

Posted: 2012-02-07 18:38:24
Reviewer: Gwen from Philadelphia burbs
Overall: (4 Stars) Comfort: (5 Stars) Style: (5 Stars)
Gorgeous material and fit! But...runs really large. I am a larger-sized gal (5'5" and 184 lbs, size 14 clothing). I usually wear a 40DD bra and 38DDD bathing suit top. I ordered a 38 FF/G and it literally fell off me. The cup size was actually good, but the chest circumference seemed more like 46" than 38" (which is why I gave it 4 stars rather than 5). However, the material is extremely substantial and top quality and will hide a myriad of body shape flaws. The side shirring is just the right amount. The style is very flattering fit for a big-topped woman. The length is the best I've seen on a tankini top because it's long enough to cover all of my belly. It is such a nice top that I'm going to exchange it for a smaller size and hope I have better luck!
Posted: 2012-04-18 17:16:38
Reviewer: Suzie from Texas
Overall: (3 Stars) Comfort: (3 Stars) Style: (5 Stars)
After reading the other review I downsized on this swim top. I wear a 36G in a bra so ordered the 34FF/G. While the cups did just accommodate me I found that they really did not offer any support. The only way to do so was to cinch the halter tie to an extremely uncomfortable level. Also the back strap just hung loosely in spite of being smaller than I would normally wear. It is really a cute tankini and I was truly hoping it would fit. The quality of the fabric seems good.
Posted: 2012-05-30 06:59:51
Reviewer: Anonymous
Overall: (2 Stars) Comfort: (2 Stars) Style: (4 Stars)
This top is very pretty but the sizing is off. I am a 36/34 G in a bra size and based on the reviews I ordered the 32 ff/g. I was so worried it was going to be too small - I am not a 32. However, it was too big. The cups fit fine but there was no support through the back strap - it was super loose. So it made all the support go to the halter strap and for a big chested gal that isn't so comfy. If the back strap had been tight, it might have been a winner - the length was great. It's going back and the hunt continues.

Battle History

Previous Month May 2013
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31